Ontario long-term care training

Do the right thing. And prove you did.

A 92-module program for the people who run an Ontario long-term care home — administrators, directors of care, and their teams. The Act and the regulation, the daily practice of care, and the leadership that holds it all together.

Request accessSee the curriculum

Built in Ontario · Current to the Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 2021 and O. Reg. 246/22

The gap

The standard is set by the Act. It’s met by whoever is on shift.

A written notification, a compliance order, a critical incident — these usually begin with an ordinary decision made quickly by someone on the floor. They were hired because they are good at caring for residents — not because anyone taught them what the Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 2021 requires, or how to leave a record that proves it happened. The knowledge sits with a few leaders who find out afterward.

Where the standard is actually met

The PSW deciding whether a skin change is worth reporting
The charge nurse the night a resident has an unwitnessed fall
The nurse updating a plan of care after a change in condition
Whoever documents the restraint — or doesn’t
The manager who hears the family’s concern before it’s a complaint

What they were given to meet it with

A policy binder they signed at orientation
An in-service, a year ago, on a different topic
The Act itself — hundreds of pages, never opened
The person before them, who also guessed
A scramble to reconstruct the record when the inspector asks

The cost of that gap is not abstract. It is the finding that becomes an order, the incident reported a day late, the accommodation of a resident’s choice that was never written down, the care that was genuinely good and simply cannot be shown. Every one of them was decided long before anyone reviewed the file.

The curriculum

Three pillars: the rules, the care, and the leadership that runs both.

The Regulations teach the legal and accountability framework a home operates within. The Care teaches the daily practice of looking after residents inside it. Leadership & Administration teaches running the whole home. Browse every track and module below.

modules: 92
tracks: 23
assessment questions: 736
lexicon terms: 144

FLTCA Foundations

The Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 2021, the regulation, and the Residents’ Bill of Rights.

1The Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 202125 min
2The Act and the Regulation25 min
3The Residents’ Bill of Rights30 min
4The Licensee’s Fundamental Obligations35 min

A long-term care home is primarily the home of its residents.

It is the Act’s fundamental principle. Everything the regulation requires flows from that one sentence — and so does everything we teach.

Why it sticks

Training they can’t click through.

Most compliance training is survivable without learning anything: pick the longest answer, pick B, click next. If your people can pass without understanding, you have a completion record and no change on the floor — and the completion record is worth nothing the day an inspector asks what actually happened.

Try the sample question. It is taken verbatim from Module 1 of the curriculum.

Answer positions are reshuffled on every attempt
There is no “usually B.” Option order is randomized each time a question is served, so a learner who memorized a position learns nothing from it.
The shortcuts are measured, not assumed
Sorting the options by length still predicts the answer far more often than chance. We measured that across all 736 questions instead of assuming it away; the figure is recorded, and a build check fails any release that makes it worse. The position shortcut above is gone outright. This one is being driven down track by track.
Eight questions per module, every one written for it
736 questions across the program. Every module carries a full eight, authored against that module’s own material rather than drawn from a generic bank — so the assessment tests what was actually taught.
The explanation is the teaching
Every answer — right or wrong — returns the reasoning, not just a score. Where an explanation cites law, it cites the current law: the Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 2021 and O. Reg. 246/22, never the repealed Act.

FLTCA Foundations · Module 1

Which law currently governs long-term care homes in Ontario?

That question is one item out of the program. You can open the product it came from — a small public preview, no account needed.

Open the preview

Delivery

Built to be taught, not just assigned.

Sending a course link to a home full of staff and hoping is not a training program. LTC IQ runs three ways at once — and the same module counts however it reached the learner.

Self-directed

Staff work the Academy at their own pace. A reading, a decision scenario, then the assessment — with progress, streaks and levels carried across sessions.

Presented live

Every module can be run as a slide deck, and 48 of them carry written speaker notes. Present from a laptop, mirror to a screen in the training room, and take the in-service without preparing a thing.

Credited after the fact

Record attendance for a session you delivered and the module completes for everyone who was there — including the XP — the next time they sign in on that installation.

Proof it happened

Certification exams

Per-track, per-pillar and a final certification, each drawn from the questions of the modules it covers — up to all 736 for the final.

Named certificates

Issued on completion, in the learner's name, carrying a verification code computed from that name and date: a checksum, not proof of issuance.

Spaced repetition

A review engine re-serves questions from completed modules, weighted toward weak spots.

Administrative record

Who completed what, and when — the evidence a Ministry inspector may eventually ask to see.

And the tools they keep using

The part that outlives the training. 22 decision tools your team reaches for on the day it actually happens —a reportable-incident triage, a staffing calculator, a consent finder — each producing a documented, structured output rather than a gut call.

Critical Incident System reportability triage
Mandatory-reporting decision tool
4-hour direct-care staffing calculator
Level-of-Care funding-envelope calculator
Consent & substitute-decision-maker finder
Restraint vs personal assistance service device (PASD) check
Inspection-readiness self-audit
Quality Improvement Plan builder

Evidence

Nobody asks what you taught. They ask what you can show.

An inspector, a family, a coroner’s counsel — none of them are interested in whether people sat through something. The question is always what you can put on the table months later. So the product is built to leave things behind.

A record of who was in the room

For a session you delivered yourself: scan badges with the tablet camera, read a printed QR card, or mark people off a list. Guests who have no account at all can still be recorded — the agency PSW covering a shift is exactly the person most likely to be missing from a training record, and most likely to be asked about.

Completion, exportable

Progress, quiz results and the modules a person finished, produced as a PDF from the browser. It is a document you can file, attach, or hand to somebody — not a screen you have to be logged in to show.

Certificates, with a checksum

Each certificate carries a verification code computed from the name and the completion date. Re-derive it later and it either matches or it does not, which catches a typo or a careless edit to a saved copy.

What that code is not, said on the certificate itself

It is a browser-computed checksum, not proof of issuance, and there is no central registry to check it against. The calculation happens in the app, so somebody holding the app can compute a valid-looking code. The certificate says this in print, and so does the admin panel, because a credential that overstates itself is worse than one that claims less. If you need tamper-evidence that survives a determined forger, that needs a server, and this does not have one yet.

And it is still not a compliance shield

Training is evidence that you took reasonable steps. It is not a discharge of the licensee’s obligations under the Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 2021, and nobody selling software can promise you an inspection outcome. Anyone who tells you otherwise is describing a product that does not exist.

Accessibility

The people who need this most are not always using a mouse.

Long-term care runs on a workforce that is older than most, often working in a second language, frequently on a shared computer in a back office with a trackpad that barely works. Training that assumes a steady hand and a good screen quietly excludes some of the people it was bought for.

So it was measured, not assumed. Every element that responds to a click can be reached with Tab and fired with Enter or Space. Dialogs close with Escape. Focus is always visible. Buttons announce a name a screen reader can read, and images carry alt text.

That is not a one-off audit. The build check binds to the shape of the defect (an onclick the browser will not focus), so a screen written next month is covered the day it is written, and the only way to exempt something is a named exclusion the check re-examines on every run.

Settings the learner controls

Built into the product, not an afterthought bolted to the browser: seven text sizes, seven zoom levels, a high-contrast mode, a dark mode, and a reduce-motion setting that the stylesheet honours. Four typefaces, including Lexend, which is designed for readers who find conventional type hard going. One button resets all of it.

What we are not claiming

Not AODA conformance, and not WCAG 2.0 AA. Neither has been assessed by anyone, and colour contrast has never been audited across the product. What is above is what was measured: keyboard operability, accessible naming, and alt text. The app also has no skip link. If your accessibility review needs a conformance report, we do not have one — we have a check you can run yourself.

Why it is in the buying conversation

Ontario institutional procurement asks about accessibility, and a training product that a keyboard user cannot operate is a question you have to answer in writing. The honest answer is worth more than a conformance badge nobody audited.

Security & data

The answers your IT review will ask for.

A multi-site operator sends a security questionnaire before it sends a purchase order. Here are the answers up front, including the inconvenient ones — a reviewer finds those anyway, and finding them here costs everyone less than finding them later.

There is no server to breach

LTC IQ runs entirely in the browser. No backend, no database, no account on our infrastructure. Nothing a learner does — including everything typed into the case-file and planning tools — is transmitted to us, because there is nowhere for it to go. We never become a custodian of your residents’ or your staff’s information.

Where the data actually lives

In the browser’s own storage, on the device in front of the learner. Forty-seven keys, and every one of them is classified by whose data it is — twelve belong to the installation, eight to the learner’s progress, sixteen to their work product, eleven to the device. Signing out clears the learner and work scopes. A build check fails if a new key is added without deciding which it is.

Passwords, and why HTTPS matters

Roster passwords are hashed with PBKDF2 through the browser’s own crypto, which browsers expose only over HTTPS. On a plain HTTP install the product renders perfectly and nobody can sign in — that is deliberate, and it is the one thing to check first if an install looks broken.

What the software fetches

Every stylesheet, script and typeface is served from your own install: twenty-seven vendored files, each recorded with a checksum, shipped with their licence texts. The exceptions are two 3D libraries, fetched from a public CDN only when the login backdrop or the walkthrough simulator opens, and written to fail quietly if they are blocked. No learner data is in those requests. A home with no outbound internet at all can run this.

This hosted copy contacts our web host

The paragraph above describes the software. This particular copy, at ltciq.ca, is served by a host that injects its own traffic script into every page — including the app. It is not in our build and carries no learner data, but it is a request to a third party and you would find it. An install on your own server does not have it.

The limits, stated plainly

Built-in accounts ship with fixed passwords and the interface cannot change them. Change them in the source before the install is reachable by anyone you would not give administrator access to.
There is no central view. A shared training computer aggregates its own learners. Everyone’s personal phone is its own island. Cross-device reporting needs a server, and there isn’t one yet.
Clearing browser data clears the record. Export what matters; there is no backup to restore from.

Who built it

Built by a practitioner, checked against the primary sources.

LTC IQ was built by the practitioner behind Labour Matrix and Labour IQ — someone who builds operator-side compliance and accountability systems for a multi-site operator. Its regulatory claims were verified against the legislation itself rather than against secondary summaries. The examples are the real ones: the skin change reported a day late, the restraint that was never a restraint on paper, the good care that couldn’t be shown.

It is Ontario-anchored and current — it cites only the Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 2021 and O. Reg. 246/22, never the repealed Act — and it is deliberately plain in its language, written for a workforce where English is frequently a second language, and where the reader is a PSW between two hallways, not a lawyer at a desk.

What this is not

LTC IQ is training, not legal or clinical advice. It does not replace your counsel, your Medical Director, or the regulation itself. It is designed to make the people around you better at recognizing the moment to escalate — and at not creating the problem in the first place.

In the same family

Labour Matrix & Labour IQ

LTC IQ shares its engine, its standards and its view of what defensible means with two siblings: Labour Matrix, where an operator’s HR and labour-relations decisions are recorded and held in a form that survives scrutiny, and Labour IQ, the same style of training for labour relations. Each product stands alone; together they’re one system for running a home well and proving you did.

labourmatrix.ca

Questions

The things people actually ask.

Including the ones where the honest answer is some form of “no”. Those are here on purpose — you would find them out in the first conversation anyway, and it is cheaper for both of us if you find them out now.

Does this keep our home compliant, or satisfy a training requirement?

No — and be wary of anyone who says it does. The licensee’s obligations under the Act stay the licensee’s, and no vendor controls what an inspector concludes. What training does is make compliance more likely and demonstrable: staff who understand the rule follow it, and a record of who was taught what, and when, is the kind of evidence you want to already have when someone asks. Buy it to make the home better, not to buy a defence.

Can I see who completed what across the home?

Within one installation, yes — there is a real roster, roles, assigned learning paths with due dates, and a team-progress view. The honest limit: there is no backend, so all of that lives in the browser it was created in. On a shared training computer, a nursing-station kiosk or a manager’s laptop it works exactly as you would expect. It does not reach across everybody’s personal phones and pull their progress into one dashboard, because there is no server for it to reach. If home-wide or multi-site reporting is what you actually need, say so in the form — it is a real product decision, not something to pretend is already there.

Does anything leave our network? What about resident information?

No learner data leaves. There is no account server and no analytics; all progress is stored by the browser itself. Note too that the product never asks for resident information — the tools work on the situation in front of you, not on a resident record. Some tools do have free-text notes fields, so treat them the way you would any working note: whatever you type stays in your browser and is never transmitted, but it is on that device. Two caveats, both set out under Security & data: the software fetches two 3D libraries from a public CDN when the login backdrop or the walkthrough opens, and this hosted copy at ltciq.ca sits behind a web host that injects its own traffic script. Neither carries learner data, and neither is present on an install running on your own server.

What do we need to run it?

A browser. No installation, no server to stand up, no IT project, no integration with your clinical system. It is plain HTML, CSS and JavaScript with no build step, which is also why it runs from a hosted URL, a network share, or a laptop carried into a home — including one with no internet connection at all, because its stylesheets, scripts and typefaces are served from the install itself.

Our staff don’t all sit at computers. How does this actually reach a PSW on the floor?

Three ways, and the same module counts however it arrived; Delivery sets out all three. The one that answers this question is the third: you run the session in a room, record who was there, and the module completes for each of them. A lot of long-term care training already happens that way and then never gets recorded.

Is this only for Ontario?

Yes, and it says so rather than pretending to be national. It is anchored to the Fixing Long-Term Care Act, 2021 and O. Reg. 246/22 — the current law, not the repealed 2007 Act that material still in circulation teaches. Other provinces have different statutes and a different inspection regime. A course vague about jurisdiction is usually vague because being specific would expose that it was not written for yours.

Who wrote it, and who checked it?

It is written by a practitioner who has worked in Ontario long-term care. The regulatory content went through a primary-source verification pass against the Act and the regulation, and it carries its own punch-list of the handful of specifics still to be confirmed rather than pretending there are none. What it has not yet had is external professional review of the Leadership & Administration material — and rather than leave you to discover that, those modules say so on the page, and tell the reader to verify pinpoint specifics against the current Act before relying on them. It is an open item, and you should know it before you buy rather than after.

Is this legal or clinical advice?

No. It teaches what the law requires and how good practice works, which is training, not advice about your situation. Real matters — a specific incident, an order, a resident’s care decision, anything with a lawyer or the Ministry on the other end — go to your own counsel and your own clinical leadership. The decision tools are structured thinking aids that show their reasoning; they are not the decision.

Can we see it before we commit?

Yes. There is a preview build for exactly this — a real, working slice of the product rather than a slide deck about it, so you can put it in front of the people who would actually use it. Ask in the form and say who will be looking at it, and you will get access with a way in that suits your IT.

What does it cost?

There is no list price yet, because the sensible answer differs by an order of magnitude between one administrator working through the leadership pathway and a multi-home operator putting every PSW, nurse and manager through it. What moves it: how many people and how many homes, whether you want it hosted or served from your own network, and whether you need something that does not exist yet — home-wide reporting being the usual one. Tell us which of those you are and you will get a number, not a discovery call.

Get started

Request access.

There is no self-serve trial, and that is deliberate. Training the staff of a long-term care home is a program, not a purchase — it works when it is scoped against your home, your programs and the decisions your people actually face.

You tell us about your home
How many homes and beds, and who you’re training — administrators, directors of care, nurses, PSWs. A two-minute form, no sales call required to start.
We scope it to you
A walkthrough of the curriculum against your own home — your programs, your inspection history, your onboarding — and what a rollout looks like.
Your people start training
Self-directed, presented live, or credited from a session you ran — with the completion record and certificates to show it happened.